Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
1. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Larrikin wrote: Reserved Fighters are in such a dreadful state I honestly first read the OP as a 20% buff. "Too strong for PvP", what? Every change has been awful. The UI is awful, the application is awful, and now a further 20% nerf? ...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2017.06.10 14:31:55
|
2. Sticky:First test of new command bursts - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Sylvia Kildare wrote: Shalashaska Adam wrote: Is it intended that the command burst modules will apply their effect to the user if they are in a fleet of just themselves? It was stated in the first thread about command bursting that the u...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.10.03 13:20:11
|
3. Sticky:First test of new command bursts - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Is it intended that the command burst modules will apply their effect to the user if they are in a fleet of just themselves?
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.10.03 03:08:48
|
4. Sticky:[Focus Group] Tactical Destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I don't suppose this feedback thread is being read at all, as per usual. All these drastic changes are not nessasery, especially for the Confessor. Look at what makes the Hecate balanced, it's purely the difference in speed mode. Damage does no...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.09.17 04:11:09
|
5. Announcement:118.8 - Issues Thread (PC) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The malediction model is bugged. The armor plate on the bottom of the bow that retracts during warp is permanently stuck in it's closed position. I hope CCP Pointybits can get on the case so my OCD doesn't kill me.
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.09.13 16:57:45
|
6. Announcement:118.8 - General feedback (PC) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The malediction model is bugged. The armor plate on the bottom of the bow that retracts during warp is permanently stuck in it's closed position. I hope CCP Pointybits can get on the case so my OCD doesn't kill me.
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.09.13 16:56:48
|
7. Sticky:[Focus Group] Tactical Destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Hey folks. The summer vacation season is over, we've done enough internal planning here at CCP to get a good estimate of exactly when different things can fit into our roadmap. I've re-read all the logs from earlier in the yea...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.08.27 17:46:17
|
8. pyfa 1.18.1 (YC 118.1 release) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Sable Blitzmann wrote: June release should be coming out tonight sometime Splendid.
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.07.01 23:43:18
|
9. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Carriers now need some major TLC, they are in a very bad place now. I think the redesign of the secondary attack on light fighters went entirely in the wrong direction, when all that was needed was the application change. They could have even don...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.07.01 14:26:06
|
10. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Carriers are now in a very bad place, almost useless as an entire ship class if they remain like this. Some major attention and very significant improvements need to be made.
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.07.01 14:20:03
|
11. pyfa 1.18.1 (YC 118.1 release) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Is there an ETA for the June release?
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.07.01 14:15:06
|
12. EFT v2.13.4 - Incursion 1.4.1 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Is there an ETA for the June release?
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.07.01 14:13:51
|
13. Post Nerf Carrier Roles: Some thoughts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
They really need to add the ability to swap out fighters in the tubes just by dragging a group over another group. That by itself would fix the hangar size issue pretty much single handedly. Right now the chimera literally doesn't have the room ...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.06.29 10:21:14
|
14. Corm/Thrasher vs Coercer/Cat - 7 turrets versus 8 - Why? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
The longbow cormorant does 154 dps out to 103 km optimal, and it tracks even ab frigates and drones flawlessly. It is a monster sniper, in groups it obliterates almost anything within that radius without even needing tackle.
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.06.29 09:51:53
|
15. Good Job CCP for breaking carriers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mephiztopheleze wrote: whatever happened to 'big weapons do less damage to small targets' thing? A carrier by definition is an exception to that rule, as it completely sucks at doing damage to things it's own size. Its entire purpose is to ...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.06.23 05:16:44
|
16. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Fyt 284 wrote: I think the fact there has been no dev response to the criticism when the nerf goes live in a week is absolutely appalling. The devs have pretty much never responded unless they see something worth ...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.06.23 05:09:52
|
17. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Increasing the number of charges for the secondary attack just makes the whole using of it more monotonous. The secondary attack needs to remain high alpha, low number of shots, that is what made it interesting. All that needed to change was the...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.06.22 22:23:13
|
18. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
On further testing, the raw damage nerf to the secondary attack of light fighters is completely unnecessary. The application hit does enough to balance out the attack, the raw damage reduction then makes it underpowered. You have limited charg...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.06.19 10:28:26
|
19. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I think the application changes make sense. However I think CCP may be forgetting the ability they now have to iterate quickly. The raw dps reduction is unnessasery, and could have been tried next month if the application changes alone weren't c...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.06.18 07:59:04
|
20. Nerf Networked Sensor Arrays - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
The NSA needs to stay as it is, for the above reasons. What should change, is the fighter attacks. The primary attack should apply its damage like the secondary attack does, and the secondary attack application changed to that of the primary att...
- by Shalashaska Adam - at 2016.05.31 14:53:36
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |